next up previous

STAT 804: Lecture 18 Notes

Forecast standard errors

You should remind yourself that the computations of conditional expectations we have made used the fact that the a's and b's are constants - the true parameter values. In fact we then replace the parameter values with estimates. The quality of our forecasts will be summarized by the forecast standard error:

displaymath116

We will compute this ignoring the estimation of the parameters and then discuss how much that might have cost us.

If tex2html_wrap_inline118 then tex2html_wrap_inline120 so that our forecast standard error is just the variance of tex2html_wrap_inline122 .

Consider first the case of an AR(1) and one step ahead forecasting:

displaymath124

The variance of this forecast is tex2html_wrap_inline126 so that the forecast standard error is just tex2html_wrap_inline128 .

For forecasts further ahead in time we have

displaymath130

and

displaymath132

Subtracting we see that

displaymath134

so that we may calculate forecast standard errors recursively. As tex2html_wrap_inline136 we can check that the forecast variance converges to

displaymath138

which is simply the variance of individual Xs. When you forecast a stationary series far into the future the forecast error is just the standard deviation of the series.

Turn now to a general ARMA(p,q). Rewrite the process as the infinite order AR

displaymath144

to see that again, ignoring the truncation of the infinite sum in the forecast we have

displaymath146

so that the one step ahead forecast standard error is again tex2html_wrap_inline128 .

Parallel to the AR(1) argument we see that

displaymath150

The errors on the right hand side are not independent of one another so that computation of the variance requires either computation of the covariances or recognition of the fact that the right hand side is a linear combination of tex2html_wrap_inline152 .

A simpler approach is to write the process as an infinite order MA:

displaymath154

for suitable coefficients tex2html_wrap_inline156 . Now if we treat conditioning on the data as being effectively equivalent to conditioning on all tex2html_wrap_inline158 for t ;SPMlt; T we are effectively conditioning on tex2html_wrap_inline162 for all t;SPMlt;T. This means that

eqnarray50

and the forecast error is just

displaymath166

so that the forecast standard error is

displaymath168

Again as tex2html_wrap_inline136 this converges to tex2html_wrap_inline172 .

Finally consider forecasting the ARIMA(p,d,q) process tex2html_wrap_inline176 where W is ARMA(p,q). The forecast errors in X can clearly be written as a linear combination of forecast errors for W permitting the forecast error in X to be written as a linear combination of the underlying errors tex2html_wrap_inline162 . As an example consider first the ARIMA(0,1,0) process tex2html_wrap_inline190 . The forecast of tex2html_wrap_inline192 is just 0 and so the forcast of tex2html_wrap_inline194 is just

displaymath196

The forecast error is

displaymath198

whose standard deviation is tex2html_wrap_inline200 . Notice that the forecast standard error grows to infinity as tex2html_wrap_inline136 . For a general ARIMA(p,1,q) we have

displaymath206

and

displaymath208

which can be combined with the expression above for the forecast error for an ARMA(p,q) to compute standard errors.

Software

The S-Plus function arima.forecast can do the forecasting.

Comments

I have ignored the effects of parameter estimation throughout. In ordinary least squares when we predict the Y corresponding to a new x we get a forecast standard error of

displaymath216

which is

displaymath218

The procedure used here corresponds to ignoring the term tex2html_wrap_inline220 which is the variance of the fitted value. Typically this value is rather smaller than the 1 to which it is added. In a 1 sample problem for instance it is simply 1/n. Generally the major component of forecast error is the standard error of the noise and the effect of parameter estimation is unimportant.

In regression we sometimes compute perdiction intervals

displaymath224

The multiplier c is adjusted to make the coverage probability tex2html_wrap_inline228 close to a desired coverage probability such as 0.95. If the errors are normal then we can get c by taking tex2html_wrap_inline232 . When the errors are not normal, however, the error in tex2html_wrap_inline234 is dominated by tex2html_wrap_inline236 which is not normal so that the coverage probability can be radically different from the nominal. Moreover, there is no particular theoretical justification for the use of t critical points. However, even for non-normal errors the prediction standard error is a useful summary of the accuracy of a prediction.


next up previous



Richard Lockhart
Mon Nov 3 11:38:29 PST 1997